Blunt aortic injury is the second leading cause of death [
1]. According to management for blunt aortic injury according guidelines [
2], it is feasible to delay repair for polytrauma patients with other severe concomitant injuries, especially if they are hemodynamically stable. Since 1997, endovascular repair has been widely used for management of aortic injury, and high success rates and low mortality rates compared with surgical treatment have been reported [
3]. However, trauma-related injuries located at an acute angle of the aortic arch and a short distance from arch vessels may predict a higher risk of endograft failure [
4]. Mosquera et al. [
5] reported that 37.9% of the conservative group had an aortic-related complication in long-term results, and the survival rate was decreased at 10 years (75.6% at 1 year, 72.3% at 5 years, and 66.7% at 10 years). Survival in the surgical group remained at 77.2% at 1, 5, and 10 years and in the endovascular group was 85.7% at 1 and 5 years [
5]. A hybrid approach for injuries that are unsuitable for endovascular repair alone is applicable for thoracic aortic aneurysm [
6]. A delayed two-stage hybrid approach for a blunt thoracic aortic injury needing repair may be a feasible strategy for management of polytrauma patients.